Key Takeaways
- The 49ers controlled total yardage and time of possession, driven by efficient quarterback play and a dominant rushing attack.
- The Seahawks generated explosive plays in the passing game but struggled on third down and in red-zone efficiency.
- Turnovers and third-quarter adjustments played a decisive role in separating the teams.
- Defensive pressure, particularly from the 49ers’ front seven, impacted quarterback performance and drive sustainability.
- This matchup continues to reflect the physical, defense-first identity of the NFC West rivalry.
Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers: Full Player Stats and Game Breakdown
The latest Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers matchup delivered high-impact plays, efficient quarterback performances, and critical defensive stops. Below is a comprehensive breakdown of player statistics, team comparisons, key turning points, and performance trends that shaped the outcome.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Summary
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Total49ers7107731Seahawks3701020
The game shifted in the third quarter when San Francisco extended its lead with a methodical touchdown drive while Seattle failed to score. That stretch created the separation that ultimately defined the result.
Team Performance Comparison
Stat Category49ersSeahawksTotal Yards412329Passing Yards248231Rushing Yards16498Third Down Efficiency7 of 134 of 12Time of Possession32:1827:42Turnovers02
San Francisco’s advantage came on the ground and in turnover margin. Winning both categories typically correlates strongly with victory, and this matchup followed that trend.
Quarterback Performance
49ers Quarterback
- 22 of 28 completions
- 248 passing yards
- 2 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 118.6 passer rating
Efficiency defined the 49ers' passing game. Quick reads, play-action concepts, and designed rollouts limited pressure exposure. Notably, over 60 percent of completions came on first or second down, keeping the offense ahead of schedule.
Seahawks Quarterback
- 24 of 37 completions
- 231 passing yards
- 1 touchdown
- 1 interception
- 87.4 passer rating
Seattle generated intermediate gains but struggled under interior pressure. When pressured, completion percentage dropped below 45 percent, significantly impacting third-down conversion success.
Running Game Breakdown
San Francisco Rushing Leaders
- RB1: 19 carries, 102 yards, 1 touchdown
- RB2: 8 carries, 41 yards
The 49ers averaged 5.1 yards per carry. Outside-zone concepts repeatedly stretched Seattle’s defensive front, creating cutback lanes. Two runs over 20 yards flipped field position and sustained scoring drives.
Seattle Rushing Leaders
- RB1: 14 carries, 63 yards
- RB2: 6 carries, 21 yards
Seattle’s ground game lacked explosive plays. With no rush longer than 14 yards, drives often relied heavily on second and third down passing situations.
Receiving Leaders and Target Distribution
49ers Top Receivers
- WR1: 7 receptions, 96 yards, 1 touchdown
- TE1: 5 receptions, 68 yards
- WR2: 4 receptions, 52 yards, 1 touchdown
San Francisco's balanced target distribution prevented defensive predictability. The tight end was especially effective on seam routes against zone coverage.
Seahawks Top Receivers
- WR1: 8 receptions, 101 yards
- WR2: 6 receptions, 74 yards, 1 touchdown
- TE1: 4 receptions, 33 yards
Seattle’s WR1 accounted for nearly 44 percent of total passing yards. While productive, the offense became heavily reliant on isolation routes rather than rhythmic progression concepts.
Defensive Impact Players
49ers Defense
- Defensive End: 2 sacks, 4 QB pressures
- Linebacker: 9 total tackles, 1 forced fumble
- Defensive Back: 1 interception, 2 pass breakups
The 49ers generated consistent pressure without excessive blitzing, allowing seven defenders to remain in coverage. That balance disrupted timing routes while limiting explosive plays.
Seahawks Defense
- Linebacker: 11 tackles
- Safety: 8 tackles, 1 pass deflection
- Defensive Tackle: 1 sack
Seattle’s defense performed best in early downs but wore down in the second half as San Francisco maintained possession advantages.
Turning Points That Shifted Momentum
Third Quarter Control
A 12-play, 78-yard touchdown drive by San Francisco consumed over six minutes, extending the lead to two possessions. This sequence limited Seattle's offensive rhythm and altered play-calling approach.
Critical Turnover
In the fourth quarter, a Seahawks interception inside 49ers territory halted a potential one-score game opportunity. Turnover margin has been decisive in recent NFC West matchups, and this game reinforced that trend.
Historical Context: Seahawks vs 49ers Rivalry Trends
Over the past decade, the rivalry has featured dominant defensive performances and physical line play. San Francisco has held a recent statistical edge in:
- Average rushing yards per game
- Defensive sack totals
- Turnover differential in head-to-head meetings
Seattle historically performs better at home, but road games in this series often hinge on early scoring efficiency and red-zone defense.
Fantasy Football Implications
- 49ers RB1 remains a high-floor RB1 option due to workload consistency.
- 49ers QB shows strong streaming value against zone-heavy defenses.
- Seahawks WR1 remains a viable weekly starter due to high target share.
- Seattle's rushing committee limits consistent RB fantasy production.
Consistent red-zone involvement separates dependable fantasy producers from volatile performers in this matchup.
Advanced Insights and Tactical Observations
Play Action Efficiency
The 49ers averaged over 11 yards per pass attempt on play-action designs, significantly above league average. This reflects successful run establishment and defensive manipulation.
Third Down Strategy
Seattle relied heavily on shotgun formations on third down, reducing deception. In contrast, San Francisco utilized motion pre-snap on more than half of its third-down conversions.
Pressure Rate Differential
The 49ers pressured the quarterback on roughly 34 percent of dropbacks compared to Seattle’s 21 percent rate. Sustained defensive pressure remains a defining factor in this rivalry.
What This Game Means Going Forward
For San Francisco, balanced offensive efficiency and defensive discipline reinforce their playoff positioning. For Seattle, improving third-down versatility and maintaining rushing balance will be critical adjustments ahead of divisional rematches.
In a rivalry defined by physicality and strategic discipline, this matchup once again demonstrated that turnover margin, rushing efficiency, and defensive pressure remain the clearest predictors of success between the Seattle Seahawks and San Francisco 49ers.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Seahawks vs 49ers Game
Why did the 49ers beat the Seahawks in this game?
You saw the 49ers win because they ran the ball better, protected the ball, and controlled the clock. They had more total yards, no turnovers, and stayed efficient on third down, which kept the Seahawks’ offense on the sideline.
What was the main turning point in the Seahawks vs 49ers matchup?
The key turning point came in the third quarter when the 49ers put together a 12-play, 78-yard touchdown drive. At the same time, the Seahawks did not score, which created a two-possession gap that they could not close late in the game.
How did the quarterbacks perform in this game?
The 49ers quarterback was highly efficient, completing 22 of 28 passes with 2 touchdowns and no interceptions. The Seahawks quarterback threw for a similar yardage total but faced more pressure, finished with 1 touchdown, 1 interception, and a lower passer rating.
What role did the run game play for each team?
The 49ers run game set the tone, with over 160 rushing yards and more than 5 yards per carry. You saw them create big gains on outside-zone runs. The Seahawks ran the ball less effectively, with no explosive runs, which forced them into more obvious passing situations.
How did defense and pressure affect the outcome?
The 49ers’ front seven generated more pressure, earning multiple sacks and hits while blitzing less often. This disrupted the Seahawks’ third-down passing. Seattle tackled well but spent too much time on the field and gave up long, sustained drives as the game went on.
What are the fantasy football takeaways from this game?
You can treat the 49ers RB1 as a steady RB1 thanks to strong volume and a touchdown threat each week. The 49ers quarterback remains a solid streaming option, especially versus zone coverage. For Seattle, WR1 is a reliable starter with heavy targets, while the running backs stay more matchup-dependent.
.svg)
