Key Takeaways
- The Alabama Crimson Tide vs Georgia Bulldogs matchup once again came down to elite quarterback efficiency and defensive execution in critical moments.
- Explosive plays in the passing game and third-down efficiency were decisive statistical factors.
- Turnovers and red-zone conversion rates created the separation in an otherwise even yardage battle.
- Advanced metrics such as yards per play, pressure rate, and success rate reveal deeper performance insights beyond the box score.
Game Overview and Final Box Score
The Alabama Crimson Tide and Georgia Bulldogs delivered another high-stakes SEC showdown marked by physical defense, vertical passing, and pivotal late-game adjustments. Both teams entered with playoff implications, and the statistical profile of the game reflects championship-level execution.
Team Total Yards Passing Rushing Turnovers 3rd Down Penalties Alabama 421 273 148 1 8-14 5-45 Georgia 395 310 85 2 6-13 7-60
While total yardage remained competitive, Alabama’s balance and ball security proved decisive. Georgia generated more air yards but struggled to maintain consistency on early downs, forcing high-leverage third-down situations.
Alabama Crimson Tide Player Stats and Performance Analysis
Quarterback Breakdown
The Alabama quarterback completed 22 of 32 passes for 273 yards, 2 touchdowns, and 0 interceptions. More importantly, he posted a passer efficiency rating above 165.0 and converted 6 third downs through the air.
Advanced metrics further strengthen the performance:
- Yards per attempt: 8.5
- Pressure-adjusted completion rate: 63 percent
- Red-zone efficiency: 2 TDs on 3 trips
His ability to extend plays outside the pocket neutralized Georgia’s edge rush and created chunk gains in the second half.
Rushing Leaders
Alabama’s ground game was efficient rather than explosive. The lead running back carried 19 times for 102 yards and 1 touchdown, averaging 5.4 yards per carry.
Key rushing notes:
- 67 percent of rushes gained at least four yards
- Two runs of 15+ yards flipped field position
- Zero lost fumbles
Designed quarterback runs added another 46 yards and helped convert multiple third-and-short situations.
Top Receivers
The primary wide receiver recorded 8 receptions for 118 yards and 1 touchdown. His average separation at target exceeded 2.8 yards, indicating success against man coverage.
Player Receptions Yards TD Avg WR1 8 118 1 14.7 WR2 5 74 1 14.8 TE 4 39 0 9.7
Explosive perimeter routes stressed Georgia’s secondary, particularly on play-action snaps where Alabama averaged 11.2 yards per attempt.
Defensive Standouts
Alabama’s defense limited Georgia’s rushing attack to just 85 yards. Linebacker play was the key difference.
- Team sacks: 4
- Quarterback pressures: 11
- Tackles for loss: 8
- Interceptions: 1
The decisive moment came in the fourth quarter when a third-down sack forced a long field goal attempt instead of a potential tying touchdown drive.
Georgia Bulldogs Player Stats and Performance Analysis
Quarterback Performance
Georgia’s quarterback completed 25 of 39 passes for 310 yards, 2 touchdowns, and 1 interception. Statistically impressive, but situational efficiency told a different story.
- Yards per attempt: 7.9
- Third-down completion rate: 54 percent
- Turnover-worthy plays: 2
Under pressure, his completion percentage dropped below 50 percent. Alabama generated interior pressure that disrupted timing routes and forced quicker reads.
Rushing Game Struggles
The Bulldogs’ ground attack never established rhythm. The lead back managed 21 carries for 72 yards, averaging just 3.4 yards per attempt.
Georgia faced second-and-long on 58 percent of offensive drives, limiting play-action efficiency and allowing Alabama’s safeties to stay deeper in coverage.
Receiving Corps Impact
Georgia’s top receiver recorded 9 catches for 124 yards and 1 touchdown. Much of that production came between the 20-yard lines.
Red-zone efficiency remained the primary issue:
- Red-zone trips: 3
- Touchdowns: 1
- Field goals: 2
Settling for field goals instead of touchdowns created the scoring gap that determined the outcome.
Defensive Metrics
Georgia’s defense forced one turnover and tallied 3 sacks. However, missed tackles and explosive plays proved costly.
- Missed tackles: 9
- Plays allowed over 20 yards: 4
- Opponent yards per play: 6.4
Containment issues on quarterback scrambles extended drives that should have ended.
Turning Points and Tactical Shifts
Third-Quarter Adjustment
Alabama increased tempo in the second half, reducing defensive substitutions and targeting matchups against Georgia’s slot corner. This resulted in consecutive scoring drives totaling 143 yards.
Fourth-Quarter Defensive Stand
With fewer than seven minutes remaining, Alabama’s defensive front generated back-to-back pressures leading to an incompletion and sack. The momentum shift prevented Georgia from regaining control.
Field Position Battle
Average starting field position favored Alabama by nearly eight yards. Hidden yardage through special teams and disciplined coverage units quietly influenced scoring opportunity.
Advanced Statistical Comparison
Metric Alabama Georgia Yards per Play 6.4 5.8 Success Rate 51% 44% Red-Zone TD % 67% 33% Pressure Rate 31% 24%
The advanced metrics validate what the scoreboard suggested. Efficiency, not necessarily volume, determined the winner.
Historical Context: Alabama vs Georgia Rivalry Trends
In recent meetings between these SEC powerhouses, quarterback efficiency consistently predicts outcomes. The winning team in the last five matchups averaged 8.2 yards per attempt and committed no more than one turnover.
Defensive pressure rates above 30 percent have also correlated strongly with Alabama victories. Georgia’s most successful outings came when holding Alabama below 150 rushing yards, a benchmark narrowly missed in this contest.
Coaching Strategy and Postgame Reactions
Alabama’s coaching staff emphasized pre-snap motion and defensive disguise, forcing Georgia to adjust coverage responsibilities. Postgame comments highlighted preparation and discipline in high-leverage moments.
Georgia’s staff acknowledged missed red-zone opportunities and tackling lapses as primary areas for improvement. Execution rather than scheme ultimately separated the teams.
What the Stats Mean Moving Forward
This matchup reinforces several championship-level indicators:
- Explosive pass plays shift momentum quickly in evenly matched contests.
- Third-down efficiency often outweighs total yardage.
- Red-zone touchdown conversion rates remain a defining metric in playoff-caliber games.
Both Alabama and Georgia demonstrated elite talent and depth. The statistical nuances behind individual player performance reveal how thin the margin remains between SEC heavyweights competing for national contention.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Alabama vs. Georgia Game Stats
Why did Alabama win despite similar total yards to Georgia?
You see Alabama win this game because of better efficiency, not yardage totals. Alabama protected the ball, finished drives with touchdowns in the red zone, and converted more key third downs, which created the scoring edge in a close yardage battle.
What were the most important stats that decided the game?
You can point to three main stats: explosive passing plays, third-down conversion rate, and red-zone touchdown percentage. Alabama was better in all three, which turned similar total yardage into a clear scoreboard advantage.
How did the quarterbacks impact the outcome?
You get a strong edge from Alabama’s quarterback, who was more efficient in high-pressure spots. He avoided interceptions, extended plays under pressure, and converted multiple third downs, while Georgia’s quarterback struggled more when pressured and had a key turnover.
Why was Georgia’s red-zone performance a problem?
When you look at the red zone, Georgia turned three trips into only one touchdown and two field goals. Those missed chances for touchdowns, compared with Alabama’s higher red-zone touchdown rate, created the scoring gap in an otherwise tight game.
What advanced metrics tell you more than the box score?
You get a deeper view from yards per play, success rate, pressure rate, and red-zone touchdown percentage. In this game, Alabama led in each of these, showing better down-to-down efficiency and pass rush impact than basic totals alone suggest.
How does this game fit into the Alabama vs. Georgia rivalry trend?
When you compare recent meetings, the pattern holds: the team with better quarterback efficiency, fewer turnovers, and strong pressure rates usually wins. This game matched that trend, with Alabama again pairing effective passing with steady defensive pressure.
.svg)
